Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Israel will become a full strategic partner with NATO by 2010. The problems with Israel and NATO as a “Partnership”

Photo: Herzliya Conference 2006

Although many heavy hands are pushing for a strengthened “Partnership” with NATO this is as far as it gets under the old NATO. With no case against Iran and pressure from Israeli’s to not become a “full member” under the current NATO ideals, the old NATO is putting on its walking shoes and heading out the door. But what characterizes a partnership from say a marriage?

Well for starters, “no accountability” of ones actions. How many jilted spouses have seen their lover go off on a tirade to find itself naked in bed with someone it doesn’t really know and then have to send apologies and flowers to fall back in favor with the family. Is this the kind of partnership Israel wants? Now lets opposite that scenario with a real marriage.

A real member marriage is a covenant before God to uphold all its declarations of faithfulness in sickness and in health till death due us part. All parties adhere to each other’s desires and needs. It’s not one-sided or prone for spontaneous out of body rants and experiences. But is this the real reason Israel does not want to fully marry into NATO?

The real reason is the current NATO is not the type of man to bring home to momma. So the question is what type of man does Israel want in NATO? Does Israel need a stronger man to bring home the oil from Iran, I mean the "bacon". Is NATO not sensitive enough? Is NATO not masculine enough?

In this day in age of modern relationships divorce, infidelity, abuse and death are far too common. Israel should re-think its priorities or it may soon be in a relationship it wished it never started in the first place.

See related articles here, here, and here.

Monday, October 29, 2007

NATO Summit 2009, A New NATO “Strategic Concept” and a possible September 11 in Afghanistan could help NATO

Image: Bakir Rahmanovic, ISN

Johnny's comment on New NATO Image above (10/31/07):
"NATO has its sights on an earth in peril"

A Brief Summary from the exhaustive article,

“Prospects for a new NATO Strategic Concept”

by: Rafael L Bardají for Strategic Studies Group

Zurich Switzerland (10/10/07)

A New Transformed NATO is likely to be unveiled at the NATO Summit 2009 celebrating its sixtieth anniversary. This transformation is being created out of necessity to deal with Islamic extremism. NATO needs to form “partnerships” with other like-minded democracies to deal with Islamic extremism. Especially in regards to energy, NATO has to be a part of new designed collective in response to Russia. NATO has to change to adapt to the future and frame a new objective “Strategic Concept”. The creation for “A New Consensus” is the primary reason for this new “Strategic Concept” that is slated for the NATO Summit 2009.

But NATO faces two problems: The European view on the US War on Terror and the lack of European military might and will. An iron and clay military sums up its EU members despite the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). France wants NATO to be a “joint defense force FOR Europe but France would accept an equal NATO to EU military". NATO has to start the transformation process in Afghanistan. NATO could succeed in Afghanistan if a 9-11 event occurred in Afghanistan. A new “Strategic Concept” for NATO should begin at the latest in Spring 2008 but The NATO Summit 2009 new “Strategic Concept” deadline may be hampered. Timing is everything.

to view the complete article click here

NATO and Israel: "This is not a shotgun marriage" says Livni

Photo: Reuters

The Atlantic Forum of Israel helped organize a visit early last week, Sunday October 21, 2007, with newly appointed NATO Deputy Secretary-General Claudio Bisogniero. Bisogniero and Livni addressed the second annual “NATO Israel Symposium” at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya on Monday night. The growing partnership between a newly transformed NATO in the Middle East is bridging a stronger partnership between Israel and its western military allies. Marking the first anniversary of Israel's Individual Cooperation Program with NATO, although not becoming a full member, Livni say’s, “This is not a shotgun marriage”.

I quite agree with Livni. I’m sure this is not. Still considered officially “newlyweds” in regards to their official public NATO nuptials, the honeymoon is just beginning. I guess its time for the groom NATO to change its old bachelor ways and step in line with the misses. A happy wife, is a happy house. I wonder how many more old friends the groom is going to have to part with. Either way the transformation of NATO continues, so lets keep sifting through the news.

click here to see the full article, "NATO Deputy Secretary-General Arrives"

Salvador de Madariaga, CIA Intellectual Propoganda, The move towards Global Governance

Findings to Constance,

Constance, you’ve probably seen this, but I queried "50 Reasons to Say No to NATO" which is Javier Solana’s Socialist Marxist Anti NATO pamphlets he so proudly dispersed to his fellow Spainards.

Upon further investigating the sources cited below, it seems to solidify into a strong CIA connection with Solana and his maternal grandfather Salvador de Madariaga. Remember, our CIA is a civilian intelligence agency of the United States government.
Its primary function is obtaining and analyzing information about foreign governments, corporations, and persons in order to advise public policymakers.

So here are my findings.

In the article, "The Incorporation of Spain and Javier Solana Into NATO", “Javier Solana, an old Fullbrighter, accused of being a CIA man inside the PSOE structure (see the book. 'Soberanos e Intervenidos, Estrategias globales, americanos y españoles,' by Jaon Garces), was the person who made the official presentation of Felipe González (PSOE's Secretary General) to the US Embassy in Madrid. (Note: Jaon Garces' link is no longer there - now you see it now you don’t).

Read article: The Incorporation of Spain and Javier Solana Into NATO

But, in lieu of Anti American feelings by the Spaniards because of the following reasons noted here from “Anti-Americanism In Spain: The Weight Of History”:

·The Spanish-American War of 1898.
·Washington’s support of Franco after the 1936-39 Civil War.
·The 1953 Pact of Madrid, which established US bases in Spain.
·The lukewarm support for Spain’s transition to democracy after Franco died.
·The Reagan administration’s backing of military dictatorships in Latin America.
·And, more recently, the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.

our American Spaniard transatlantic relations seemed to only strengthen rather than dissipate.

Read article: "Anti-Americanism In Spain: The Weight Of History"

Now what can possibly tie this strained relationship together?
As you and others have plainly stated Constance, “Global Governance”.

In the article, “Caution the Dialectic Process At Work part 2", Dennis Cuddy opines a connection with Javier Solana and the CIA, where he writes, “At this point, it is worth remembering that under the Dialectic, the CIA befriended (funded) Socialists in Spain to control them or at least make them less radical”.

Read article: "Caution: The Dialectic Process At Work Part 2"

After several internet queries I found in his book, “The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters”, author Frances Stonor Saunders cites that Salvador de Madariaga was one of several intellectuals recruited by the CIA for ideaological propaganda to counter the view that liberal democracy was less compatible with culture than communism.

See book: "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters"

A Spanish site also corroborates this issue, translated “The Intellectuals in Service to the CIA”.

Read article: "Intelectuales al servicio de la CIA"

The organization most noted as the vehicle by which the CIA did this was “The Congress for Cultural Freedom”, abbreviated here as CCF.

Read brief history: "The Congress for Cultural Freedom"

Bertrand Russell, one of many CIA CCF intellectuals, defined here as, “Cold War Propagandist” cites that he joined Salvador de Madariaga as one of the honorary chairmen in The Congress for Cultural Freedom

Read article: "Bertrand Russell Cold War Propogandist"

At this book preview entitled “The CIA, the British Left, and the Cold War: Calling the Tune?” I found the chapter “British Intellectuals and The Congress for Cultural Freedom” which is defined as a reference stating that during the late 1940s the newly created CIA, in a loose alliance with anti-communist intellectuals and trade unionists, launched a massive, clandestine effort to win the Cold War allegiance of the European left. Salvador de Madariaga is noted.

Preview book excerpt: "The CIA, The British Left, And The Cold War: Calling The Tune?"

Michael Josselson, who was also one of many CIA CCF intellectuals, is noted here as leaving the State Department in 1950 to help steer the newly created Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF), a liberal, anti-Communist organization founded by American and European intellectuals to expose Communist cultural oppression and to oppose all forms of totalitarian rule. One of his intellectual correspondents during and after the CCF was Salvador de Madariaga.

Read article: "Michael Josselson Papers"

Now, moving to the present.

Something noteworthy to consider was last years 2006 aloof position Javier Solana took in regards to CIA detainee flights into Europe, secret prisons and torture therein.
Remember, Solana is considered as “Mr. Europe – The Voice of Europe”.

Solana is questioned last year in regards to what knowledge he had of any EU/US agreement permitting the illegal rendition flights on the use of EU member states by the US secret service (CIA) for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners.

Read Article: "Solana Faces EU Committee on CIA Activity"

In this article Solana is accused of, “washing his hands of responsibility” in regards to CIA flights and detention centres operating in Europe, Solana said, “Professionally, in the role I have now (May 3, 2006), I have no competence to question EU Member States”.

Read article: "Javier Solana: “No Information” On CIA Renditions Or Detention Centres"

Another article entitled, “EU Chief: No Proof Of Secret Prisons - But Javier Solana Evasive On Dubious CIA Actions In Europe, Lawmakers Say” addresses the same issue.

See article: "EU Chief: No Proof Of Secret Prisons"

Now all of this may seem far-reaching, but I submit this to you and everyone to critically examine these sources.

Remember the old saying, “the fruit does not fall to far from the tree”. Lets keep that in mind in regards to this.

Remember also, this year in Aachen Germany Javier stated when receiving the Charlamagne Prize, “I was privileged to be born into a family with a long-standing commitment to Europe. Naturally it gives me great satisfaction to note that, along with Salvador de Madariaga, two members of this family have now received this eminent distinction”.

See speech: "Dr. Javier Solana Madariaga Charlemagne Award 2007"

What we may have here is a pre-designed movement from inside our own U.S. to steer the masses further away from its own liberty and freedom towards global governance.
Each person deserves to know which representative and organization in their own government stands with and stands for and, at this moment in U.S. history to voice their opinion in regards to these issues.

As you have said before Constance ,"Everyone deserves one kind warning".

Sunday, October 28, 2007

51 Reasons To Say NO To Global Governance

“51 Reasons To Say NO To Global Governance”

In the spirit of celebrating United Nations Day October 24, 2007


In the spirit of celebrating Javier Solana’s
“50 reasons To Say No to NATO”

And also

In the spirit of celebrating Javier Solana's Anti-Damascus Road Experience from



I present to all

“51 Reasons To Say NO To Global Governance”

1. Global Central Bank corruption, fraud and abuse with no accountability
2. Global Government corruption, fraud and abuse with no accountability
3. Military Industrial Complex corruption, fraud and abuse with no accountability
4. Global Police State powers enacted
5. Secret policies and amendments without the publics consent
6. Transfer of wealth from the middle class to the Upper Class
7. No more local voice
8. No public accountability
9. Media control by corporations and banks
10. No freedom of speech
11. No Habeas Corpus no more innocent until proven guilty
12. No liberty to travel to and fro strict activity prohibitions applied
13. No liberty to believe in ones own belief as TRUTH
14. Extreme taxation
15. Military abuse
16. Corporate and Bank run governments and municipalities
17. Pharmaceutical fraud and abuse with no accountability
18. Medical fraud and abuse with no accountability
19. Secret tribunals in the public/private sector
20. National Sovereignty abolished
21. Electronic Vote manipulation, fraud and abuse with no accountability
22. Financial market manipulation, fraud and abuse with no accountability
23. Consensus herd mentality decisions instead of individual mentality decisions
24. Multilateral Organizations manipulation, fraud and abuse with no accountability
25. Favoritism toward relatives and relationships, based upon that relationship, rather than on an objective evaluation of ability or suitability – Nepotism
26. Regional Organizations manipulation, fraud and abuse with no accountability
27. Corporate and bank Global Government run agriculture
28. Corporate and bank Global Government run athletics
29. Corporate and bank Global Government run entertainment
30. No relevance to the individual but rather to the interests of relevant stakeholders/shareholders in Global Government
31. No more self defense or self protection
32. Local and state laws no longer enforced
33. Global Judicial manipulation, fraud and abuse with no accountability
34. No more personal rights
35. Philosophy implemented and enforced as truth EQUAL to religion
36. Handicapped and mentally challenged individuals are categorized as handicap to society
37. No more parental rights, children are sole Global Government World Citizen owned
38. Abortion mandated quotas enforced globally
39. Energy resource manipulation, fraud and abuse with no accountability
40. One size regional rule of law cannot fit all
41. Global education cites global mandated curriculums only
42. Central global governance will mandate own religious belief system
43. Central global governance will mandate tracking of every living being
44. Central global governance mandated modern weather modification technologies
45. Central global governance mandated and enforced vitamin and mineral supplements control
46. Central global governance mandated sexual interdependent activity prohibitions
47. Central global governance mandated expression of thoughts activity prohibitions
48. Central global governance mandated food and liquid consumption activity prohibitions
49. Central global governance mandated arts creation activity prohibitions
50. Central global governance mandated radio frequencies activity prohibitions
51. Central global governance mandated human excretion activity prohibitions

These are the 51 reasons to say NO to Javier Solana’s Global Governance world.