Validate or Un-Validate Judaism Discovered: Just The Facts, Maaaam

Michael Hoffman
Christian
Revisionist Historian

Landing On Opinion or Critical Analysis

***

Herb Peters photo, taken from Fulfilled Prophecy.com

Herb Peters' investigative journalistic integrity has paved the way for an un-biased critical analysis of Bible Prophecy from a unique vantage point. And, in that respect, it is very understandable how the "thought conditioning process" in many circles of Christianity has diverted his findings under the premise of fiction. His ideas are against the grain of modern Christiandom. So let us un-validate Herb.

To justify fiction from non-fiction, opinion from analysis, any constructive critique to truly dis-miss Herb Peters would first have to be done with his book, Recommendation 666: The Rise Of The Beast From The Sea.

Before the onslaught of the internet websites, forums and blogs there were fortresses of books. These books, which more often than none, depending on subject matter and purpose, would be used to define the author's Fact from Fiction and afterward be placed in its appropriate category.

As this writer investigated Herb Peter's book, without question, hands down the analysis is secure on factually backed sources. Solid ground, period. And without question, his conjecture is securely stated and accentuated. You will differ between them both. His analytic published written work was validated. Now, let us un-validate Constance.

Constance Cumbey photo taken from News With Views.com

Constance Cumbeys' investigative journalistic integrity has also paved the way for an un-biased critical analysis of Bible Prophecy from a unique vantage point . And, in that respect, it is very understandable how the "thought conditioning process" in many circles of Christianity has diverted her findings under the premise of fiction. Her ideas are against the grain of modern Christiandom. So let us un-validate Constance.

Again, to justify fiction from non-fiction, opinion from analysis, any constructive critique to truly dis-miss Constance Cumbey would first have to be done with her book, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow.

Before the tsunami of the internet websites, forums and blogs there were shorelines of books. These books, which more often than none, depending on subject matter and purpose, would be used to define the author's Fact from Fiction and afterward be placed in its appropriate category.

As this writer investigated Constance's book on The New Age Movement, without question, hands down the analysis is secure on factually backed sources. Again, solid ground, period. And importantly, without question, her conjecture is securely stated and accentuated. You will differ between them both. Her analytic published written work, from this author's perspective, is thoroughly validated. Now, let us un-validate Michael Hoffman.

Michael Hoffman photo taken from Revisionist History.org

Michael Hoffmans' investigative journalistic integrity has paved the way for an un-biased critical analysis of Bible Prophecy from a unique vantage point. And, in that respect, it is very understandable how the "thought conditioning process" in many circles of Christianity has diverted his findings under the premise of fiction. His ideas are against the grain of modern Christiandom. So let us joyfully, un-validate Michael.

To justify fiction from non-fiction, opinion from analysis, any constructive critique to truly dis-miss Michael Hoffman would first have to be done with his book, Judaism Discovered: A Study Of The Anti Biblical Religion Of Racism, Self Worship, Superstition, And Deceit.

Before the storm of the internet websites, forums and blogs there were the replenishing rains of books. These books, which more often than none, depending on subject matter and purpose, would be used to define the author's Fact from Fiction and afterward be placed in its appropriate category.

At present, as this author investigates Michael Hoffman's book, without question, hands down the analysis is secure on factually backed sources. Once again, solid ground, period. And without question, his conjecture is securely stated and accentuated. You will differ between them both. So, from this author's current view his analytic published written work is validated.

Conclusion?

Landing on opinion and analysis, validating or un-validating published written works takes time and most importantly takes extra effort to confirm, re-confirm and confirm once more sources and opinions. So how can this author dare to compare all three differing spectral views solely based on the idea of verification of sources and differing facts from thoughts. In my opinion the answer can be substantiated by this statement.

"All three journalists, without a shadow of a doubt, state that their books are not the completion of the investigation. Each author states that they do not hold the final statement on the subject matter. Each author has been gifted with the foresight that more information will come to light."

Solely basing the investigative author's credibility and reporting on their internet websites does not paint the complete picture.

I will not criticize, I will not unvalidate until I investigate fully and thoroughly for myself.

If I am ready to throw all three books on the flame of discontent to warm my soul to that which I hold as cold, completed truth, then I too should be kindled as an un-validated ember.

Johnny